/lit/ - Literature

looks like your deterritorializing, kid. your on the right path. soon you're schizo-self will be collected in the all-multiple rhizoma. but until then... you re gonna endure the immanence...
se you on the other side, treeman

looks like your deterritorializing, kid. your on the right path. soon you're schizo-self will be collected in the all-multiple rhizoma. but until then... you re gonna endure the immanence...
se you on the other side, treeman

>>12972945
You will grow out of your Nietzschean phase when you'll enter your Deleuzeguattarian phase. It will be glorious, don't worry

>>11896853
Excusez-moi?

DUDE FELIX
OPEN THE WINDOW
I CAN FUCKING FLY

>“The various forms of education or ‘normalization’ imposed upon an individual consist in making him or her change points of subjectification, always moving towards a higher, nobler one in closer conformity with the supposed ideal. Then from the point of subjectification issues a subject of enunciation, as a function of a mental reality determined by that point. Then from the subject of enunciation issues a subject of the statement, in other words, a subject bound to statements in conformity with a dominant reality”

Was he a genius or just full of shit and stringing wordsalad for hundreds of pages?

>*blocks the translucent pathways on which your double-hydrated desiring-machines had hitherto calcified under conditions of maximum altitude, thereby allowing for a reconfigured incandescence to emerge as an alternative triage of micro-organizing principles*

>i'm a metaphysician in the sense that i think "Being" is that which is always "a problem" (at issue) for that which conceptually determines being (the human)
>also every concept is an irreducibly historical multiplicity, and to do philosophy is to attend to the perpetual becoming of the concept-essence, not substance metaphysics
>there can never be a stable concept in the platonic sense of a 'real' essence or universal, duh, because every concept is actually a multiplicity define by *difference*~
>but i don't like phenomenology guys!! i don't like that heidegger fella and i'm certainly not saying what derrida is saying

Why not just admit you're doing phenomenology

Foucault does this too, just fucking admit it's phenomenology you fucking French dickhead

I'm an avid reader of Foucault, Deleuse, Derida, and other french philosophers who taught me a lot about the interactions between knowledge, power, identity, and how those influence and are influenced by social constructs...
Recently, I've understood the notion of identity my master Deleuze tried to describe in his life time: to Deleuze, difference is not what differs from identity, but it is identity that emerges from differences. He basically inverted the metaphysics here, wow, a bit like Einstein with strong equivalence principle, fascinating...
Let me cite wikipedia first, and I'll then explain my arguments.
"Apparent identities such as "X" are composed of endless series of differences, where "X" = "the difference between x and x'", and "x'" = "the difference between...", and so forth."
So basically, for Deleuze, there is no intrinsinc essence of things, just ways to compare them and their differences up to infinity. Doing that, Deleuze is sending identity to infinity.
Now, if we apply this very bright idea in mathematics, we can also send the "identity" of a real number to infinity, and thus, show that the reals we all believe on are all social constructs...
Indeed, let r be a real number. Then, one can perfectly send this r to infinity as follow: r = 1+(r-1) = 1+1+(r-2) = 1+1+1+(r-3) = 1+1+1+...
As a result, all real numbers are equals to 1+1+1+1... so they are all social constructs. Is this a proof that formal systems work because we believe in them rather than absolutely?

*rhizomatic flight lines behind you*
hehe, nothing personal, millenial

>>8860305
>>8860311
Post-Modernism is fucking awesome, you two are just piss scared faggots, afraid of facing the reality that always was

"Flying anuses, speeding vaginas, there is no castration."

"Let's go all the way, the wolves are 'all the fathers and doctors in the world; but the Wolf-Man thinks, 'You trying to tell me my ass isn't a wolf?'"

How do I become a Body without organs?