/lit/ - Literature

Any sublime object of ideology would be shared, but never as a philosophy.

>Cinema is the ultimate pervert art. It doesn't give you what you desire--it tells you how to desire.
what is the anti-pervert art?

>>12249568
>big slavic brute
Zizek is more of a alpinid/neo-danubian phenotype.

>>10956958
You make it look like bitching about that a girl likes Ellen Hopkins is now less worse than it actually is.

>>10950741
I'm not suggesting a "no borders" policy, if your reading abilities weren't affected by the shaking anxiety caused by my penetration of your ideological mist then you wouldn't start accusing me of something that I didn't even imply in my post. They knew enough to put borders around three ethnic groups (iraq), you also have cases where the border goes straight through a village. Plus in Iraq you currently have one part of the country as a quasi independent state in a state that is controlled by the Kurds. So far to my knowledge about the middle east and your knowledge about anything.

the second part of your post is complete rubbish and only reflects my previous analysis

>>10950771

>migrationwatchuk.org

I'm done talking with you.

All this ideology.

>>10305828
>mfw began with Zizek moved onto Lacan and back to Zizek then onto Hegel

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tore_Tvedt
>I think that Tvedt was actually a good man, not only in himself but in the eyes of others too. You see, Hitler's defeat is less significant and less useful for us than his demonization. The latter is much more important for providing a nexus of sociocultural faux pas, enshrined in the context of world war and that of its defeat, paradoxically - or perhaps not - we must be cautious in our quantitative likening of current Hitleric thinking to Hitler, lest we risk the thawing of the icon of our alleged hatred of Hitler by admitting that there are many near-Hitlers among us here and now, and we're actually alright with it. Thus, Tvedt is a good man, he's not like Hitler. He must not be.

Side note: how the hell would Zizek pronounce "Tvedt"?

https://youtu.be/kh32E6O4K0k

what is the future for the humanities?

So /lit/, what steps are you taking to build your eccentric persona? (a necessity to become a famous intellectual)

>>8905981
>>8905976
If every sense in which we aquire knowledge is tainted then how does one correctly approach it?

>>8839625
>I'm not sure about this. I feel like he puts on the academic mantle to cover up insecurities, and he proclaims sincerity in order to better disguise his extremely embedded sense of irony. But it's worth taking into consideration that he may actually be a genuine guy.

This is the usual meme reading but frankly I think Wallace only hinted at this because he was afraid of the very platitudes he inhabited that the idea of this more authentic figure behind it all was an escape.

He wore his face as a mask.

>>8756197
>What do you call this kind of thinking where complexity is reduced to all-encompassing ideological figures?

Ideology

>>8526628
He's /fa/, you just have shit faggot taste