[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.2462828 [View]
File: 114 KB, 813x439, 1330728467098.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2462828

>>2462742
Since this was the best post, I'll add my comments as a reply.
>No serious scholar believes this. Intelligence is g, i.e. the common factor of everything that requires intelligence i.e. intelligence tests, complex problem solving, high skill jobs etc.
I think the weighting of components on the IQ test can be said to line up with the skills most useful to a modern economy (i.e. where most such test are administered). Native Americans have a pattern of advantage on tests of spatial reasoning (and big cranial capacity), and are most likely better at navigating and like tasks.
But verbal/mathematical skills have greater economic value, and populations with a long history of agriculture (a way of life with more in common with ours) tend to do better on these.
I would also like to point out that the black-white income disparity largely disappears when IQ is controlled for, and the gap in education disappears completely. Some posters don't seem to be aware of that.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]