/lit/ - Literature

>>6514135
May be the accumulation of capital thing I used wasn't a very good argument, as you point. But money needs to flow, not to accumulate and get static. That's why I defend that we should tax capital and patrimony better than consume and exchange of goods. The opposite is just an excuse for greedy rich people to not pay a dime in taxes that, ironically, are also spent in keeping them in their position.
Also, sorry for all of this Piketty-tier shit.

Has /lit/ ever been truly proud of something it's written? Something it genuinely knew was quality literature, and that everyone else seemed to know too?

I have felt that feeling today, /lit/, and let me tell you it is spectacular.