>>15332990
>>15333003
1. I'm in a loving long-term relationship and will be married within the next few years.
2. That's not an argument.
3. Such a paradigm is already coming into existence, and it has resulted in everyone besides a small aristocracy of men having less sex, not more.
4. The amount of sex people have cannot by itself serve as a criterion of the rectitude and/or functionality of a system.
5. The reason why monogamy arose in our common ancestor Ardipithecus more than a million years ago is that it allows for greater average levels of sex among men, improves fertility, produces greater certitude of paternity, and improves the fitness of offspring. There is literally no evidence anywhere that the mating system that people like you seek to create will benefit our species in either the short or the long run.