/lit/ - Literature

I've been doing a lot of thinking lately. Women (a large majority of them at least), are not malicious on purpose; it's a part of their nature, they can't help it. A woman will never love in the same way that a man can, its not possible. So what do you do? Go gay? No. That's a sin, first off, and there are plenty of examples and studies that show the reality of homosexual relationships. After awhile you start to cast about, looking for love and not caring what form it comes in, man or woman, and I've realized that no matter where I turn, I cannot find what I'm looking for. I've become convinced that it doesn't exist, and even if it did, the odds of me and that person ever coming into contact are slim. Plus, I'm a massive retard, I'd probably fuck up if I ever did get the chance and meet somebody. It almost feels like an intentional choice; either get with a woman and deal with the hardships that relationship brings, or get with a man and turn into a degenerate and slide into sin. Where do you turn? Is this why so many people have become monks or nuns, because there wasn't anybody else to love except God himself?

>Tor is currently not accepting any submissions of any kind
>Orbit is only accepting submissions if you're represented by a literary agent
>DAW is the only well-known imprint accepting unsolicited manuscripts

>>12334125
It's almost exactly the same position the RCC takes.

Are there any philosophers that are in favor of suicide and possibly committed suicide because of it? I'm not looking for a reason to commit suicide I've actually started to get into philosophy to avoid it actually but I've been curious if there have been philosophers who just jumped head first into the void and viewed suicide as the only answer.

>>11770836

>Deleuze.jpg
>confirmed philosophical fad/group chaser

Opinion Status: DISCARDED

>>11009841
>Mfw there are people on this board who are a synthesis of Thus Spoke Zarathustra and Thus Spoke Zarathustra only

>>10986194