/lit/ - Literature

>>19304976
>waaaaah! waaaaaah! go back! waaaaah!
No.

>>19129851
>>19131842
>>19131949
>NOOOOOO! THE GREEKS WEREN'T GAY! I DON'T LIKE IT WHEN PEOPLE ARE GAY! WESTERN CIVILIZATION CANNOT HAVE BEEN MADE BY FAGGOTS! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
My fucking sides

I'm making a /lit/ guide to self-help literature.

So far I got:
12 rules for life (obviously)
How to Win Friends and Influence People
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
bronze age mindset.
The Mystery Method: How to Get Beautiful Women Into Bed
The power of now
The Anxiety Solution: A Quieter Mind, a Calmer You
You Do You, how to be who you are and use what you've got to get what you want.

Anyone got anything else I should add?

>>11511982
>The only structural racism that exists in the US is against white men

Literature is one field where we can objectively measure discrimination through the use of pen names.

This of course, drives the left fucking nuts, as it turns out that despite whites being overrepresented in English literature, all the evidence points to them being discriminated against. They just can't fucking handle it. It shorts out their brain. They have to rationalise why white men can get published as other authors is somehow them cheating, because they know how to write interesting compelling English stories, but people will read them just because they claim to be Asian who nobody would expect to write compelling English stories, so that's totally unfair!

BAWWWWWWWWW! Why won't whites accept us discriminating against them? Don't they understand us oppressing them is all in the interest of fairness? There is no way whites could dominate writing so much unless they were cheating and oppressing others! Just because they can still get published as other races doesn't mean that they aren't getting published because of their race! BAWWWWW!

You all sound like the fucking white supremacists that downplay how Asians consistently get higher grades with the most retarded mental gymnastics. Whites are good writers, deal.

>>8891116