/lit/ - Literature

>>8878968
>>8878963
>>8878924
>nu nu nu nu
>reddit reddit reddit reddit

You have to go back

>>8533042
You don't even know what that word means, do you?

>>8379208

>>8370332

>>8309479
Le Guin is fucking shit.
>>8312064
>>8312072
>>8312076
>>8312087
Nice samefagging, he is better than Sanderson and Guy Gavriel Kay

>>7858016
Literally muslim-tier reaction :D

I consider women my equal, it was Aristoteles, her "teacher" who said that women are incapable of logical thinking and so much she praised him that she made his statements true.

I don't doubt her influence on american economy, I just don't care enough about american economy to take it into account.

I won't even list the amount of typos or errors your writing has.

Faggot.

Please delete your post and do a lithuanian.

>>6909832
>take the redpill
>cuck
>/pol/
holy fuck lmao

>>6836795

/pol/ is a brilliant example of groupthink producing a negative echo chamber of ideas; on /pol/, the incentive is for a member to so drastically rethink his morality, ethics, social values, and political ideology that he comes out the other side essentially unrecognizable, precisely because he is severely socially punished for thought which does not go along with the norm. This is the root of ideology; /pol/ may claim that it is not censored only as far as legality is concerned. In every other sense, there is no dissent on /pol/ unless you are prepared to go absolutely nowhere.
This didn't happen overnight. /pol/ is unique in that it arose out of contrarianism that gelled into a facsimile of earlier ideologies; it is an internet version of cargo cults, borrowing ideological elements from failed political experiments precisely because they contain shock value and repulse ordinary people; the point is not, then, to actually benefit the members of any group except its own, certainly not the public at large, which it loathes; the point for many of them who are "true believers" is exactly what it seems: total rejection of social norms and morality because they feel enfranchised by the power and attention that being morally and politically incorrect garners.
For lesser posters, it's more of a shitshow, a form of interactive entertainment. Over time, what was once catharsis and parody may become genuine belief as the poster in question has more incentive to actually believe that his internet role is genuine. However, it would be a mistake to take /pol/ at its word about anything; they haven't a clue how to recruit more people than those who have already A) chugged the kool-aid or B) are generally antisocial.
The thing to remember is that the very reason that /pol/lack regulars post so often and are so vehemently angry isn't even that anger is addicting, although it is; it is that they are politically losers, and they know it. Disconnection from reality, like misery, loves company.