/lit/ - Literature

>>15648244
>>15648247
thanks. I feel like a retard now for only googling "ur-text" rather than just "ur" or "ur prefix".
>it is excellent. Gaddis is much more serious than Pynchon or Heller, at least in this book
I have read high praises for this book for years in this board. Haven't read a big book in a while, last one was The Tunnel. Given the coronachan, I'm considering jumping into it. I've enjoyed thoroughly every Pynchon book I've read so I think it's a safe bet, given what I've read about it.


>>15648254
Didn't know about this.

>>15489717
first of all it's written in french.
The retarded anglos are in majority here, they'd rather "obsess" with books written in english, since they are unable to read works in any other language but english in the original.
Second, if only about 5% of the posters here have read GR, imagine how many have read the entirety of ISOTLT.

>>11699120

>>9778109
>>9778302
gass and gaddis are on my to-read list, nabokov too. I've seen vollman mentioned here a few times, will look it up. any specific recommendations for mcelroy (I've only seen women and men, cannonball and a smuggler's bible posted here) and schmidt, besides bottom's dreams?

thanks

>>9759879

>>9470020
you shall never unsee

>>9453190
thanks, those seems like very solid advice.

>Time management is the one thing screwing over most neets.
thats for sure. I love reading, but when I had to choose what to do with so little time, I probably wanted to do things that are more "convinient" or "seductively entertaining", like watching baseball or football or a movie. And during the day, I want to read when I arrive home after having dinner, but I just do this and that and when I see it its past 11pm. I will definitely start doing those 3 things tomorrow, thanks a bunch

and I didn't mean to trigger anyone with the frog, its the best reaction faces I've got

>>9087340
something like this