/lit/ - Literature

>>4660866
if you don't know a thing about the subject it might sound impressive indeed. they have answers for questions that do not and cannot have an answer. theirs is usually just the belief in the us american academy. some of their «flaired historians» are American bureaucracy, others work in a think tank and do not deny it, their big expert on late antiquity is otherwise a clergyman. it is naive to pick out reddit out of everything else found on the internets. In particular if you're not just out for a good mark in an america hogeschool.
>>4660853
so you are the debasement whale?