/lit/ - Literature

I am a scientist and I think Feyerabend focuses too much on methodology of science. I listen to his criticisms and I don't think I've seen them played out very much

Mind you I've only read Against Method which is what the book was about so herp a der
p

and:
>>1453190
>the flood of inane papers that now constitutes
... I spend my days reading papers and a lot of good comes from it. just saying.

>Are you attending/have you attended university? If so, where?
Oxford, Brasenose
DPhil in irish-american poetry

>What do you want to do with your life?
read

>What are you doing with your life right now?
reading and fucking

>Favorite author of all time?
Orwell and Donne

Has anyone in this thread read his books?

>>1375537

I've actually read it. It is good. Worth reading.

It is rare to find someone who has an internally consistent logic and philosphy.

I don't like how Dawkins offers Science as a replacement for religion, I think they are two different beasts. I don't think he is incorrect in what he says, but it leads to religous people picking holes in science and asserting that proves religion true. E.g. "Science doesn't know what happened before the big bang, so God exists". Those type of falacies that for some reason are effective in rhetoric.

But, yeah, give it a read.