/lit/ - Literature

>>13068386
Mentally ill.

>>13068933
t. seething Zizek.
Probably really is. I don't see why you would be this upset unless you had a stake in this. Either that or you're profoundly mentally ill. But those aren't mutually exclusive. That's a given if you're Zizek in the first place. Zizek has motor tics, grimaces, disturbed manner of speech, all indicating SEVERE mental illness. I look at him, I don't see a cocaine fiend or drug user as people think with le sniff; I see someone who is sick in the head, and would have been better off medicated and put to manual labor than entertaining his delusions on the stage. He doesn't offer anything valuable. He surrounds himself around obtuse philosophies that's easy to pseud your way around, Hegel to Schelling to Lacan (the biggest hack of them all). The net result is a Frankenstein bastardization of all of them.
Next time, try being more original instead of memorizing your lines like a puppet. Sorry you can't hold your own here. Maybe if you weren't an quirky EEOC nutjob case, you would have fallen into obscurity where you belong. This whole thread has clearly irritated you, Slavoj. Most professors are midwits but I'll give them credit for not memorizing their lines word-for-word like parrots. But then again who am I? I'm a colossal moron compared to Monsieur Professor Slavoj Zizek, esteemed author of "dozens of books", 'all based on his own philosophical system'. If this really is you Zizek, I give you ten years before you're institutionalized at a psychiatric facility where you belong. Really great minds see through your pseudery, and you cannot handle it when they do. You'll get no pats on the back from midwit undergrad pseuds here.