/lit/ - Literature

>>15136355
>but physiognomy is not phrenology
Never said it was, I said he was dumb enough that he couldn't even grasp such a simple thing, let alone phrenology which is more advanced.
>>15136342
We don't have avatars on imageboards, anon. Again, why not just take materialism all the way if you're going to go that path? Rejecting morality, understanding the world only through the material, etc. You'd have to accept scientific racialism and reject retarded notions of 'equality' stemming from liberalism, that racially we are not the same at all and so forth.