/lit/ - Literature

>>13382107
What???? Whatever the hell you're smoking, I'll take some.

>write the LSAT
>write the
>write the
I doubt anyone is creating tests on this site anon.
Taking them, maybe.
Writing them, no.

>>13113392
It absolutely is about pleasure. There is no other grounding for the indulgence in these acts aside from pleasure. To deny that is to contradict yourself and inherently refute Singer's ethics.

The claim: [ it is about sex with animals in general ] is vague and undefined, and fails to establish any impetus behind the ethical framework that you propose.

>>12917718
Goes to show that Lacan and Delueuze are hacks.
The only reason a fraction of this board likes Lacan because le sniff man talked about him. He was an idiots savant that through autistic fits in the midst of a lecture. Fuck Lacan and his fanbase.

Don Quick Oates.

>>12901734
/thread.

>I am an [x]
>I am becoming an [x]
kek
Imagine becoming so far entrenched in politics left or so far right, actually wherever on the spectrum, that you pick one and start identifying with one or the other instead of realizing how contradictory that is and how bounded you are in thought. HAHAHA. Go beyond picking an end of the horse shoe. Go beyond welding both ends like the Nazbols do. Weld it, pick it up, and flip it upside down, and recast it if you want. It's malleable and can be in hundreds of shapes. Liberal. Right Wing. Marxist-Leninist. Anarcho-Primitivist. Centrist. The list goes on. Pick and choose for the situation and just capriciously change to embarrass every brainlet who subscribes to these. The entertainment value alone exceeds the prideful goal of wanting to change the world which is only going to give you a frustrating, miserable, life.