[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.12943192 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1511488364911.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12943192

>>12943181
Basically this. Leave the history anons alone!

>> No.10393803 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1511488364911.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10393803

>> No.10321589 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1511488364911.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10321589

>>10321448
hehehe

>> No.10307049 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1438566132556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307049

The Illiad lifts my spirit with its depictions of incredible bravery and courage. It also sheds another light on Nietzsche's philosophy as a bonus.

Are there more recent books which have the same heroism and the same life-affirming philosophy or is Homer the best and only of this kind?

>> No.8908710 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1438566132556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8908710

What types of humor adapt well to literature? Are actual jokes and standup-like material bound to look childish in literature?

>> No.7276608 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1438566132556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7276608

What are some books about the history of literature? that present the different periods of literature and their characteristics?

>> No.6919748 [View]
File: 470 KB, 986x1369, 1418018887227.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6919748

Even though /lit/ is big on philosophy i've never seen the hard problem of consciousness being discussed here.

>The hard problem of consciousness is the problem of explaining how and why we have qualia or phenomenal experiences—how sensations acquire characteristics, such as colors and tastes. David Chalmers, who introduced the term "hard problem" of consciousness, contrasts this with the "easy problems" of explaining the ability to discriminate, integrate information, report mental states, focus attention, etc. Easy problems are easy because all that is required for their solution is to specify a mechanism that can perform the function. That is, their proposed solutions, regardless of how complex or poorly understood they may be, can be entirely consistent with the modern materialistic conception of natural phenomena. Chalmers claims that the problem of experience is distinct from this set, and he argues that the problem of experience will "persist even when the performance of all the relevant functions is explained".

Thoughts? Pic unrelated

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]