/lit/ - Literature

Does anybody ever learn psychoanalysis and conclude and believe, using that theory, they are fucked in the head?
Unironically, I mean, not with a smug smile saying naturally everybody is.

>I'm a man - tell me about masculinity, so I know what to do
You'll really just end up spooking yourself.

As has been mentioned, that rightwing homosexual apologist tries to work out a notion of masculinity
https://youtu.be/i-JWqHlKpU8

If you're about men-women dynamics, the "academic side" of the redpill is worked out by
http://therationalmale.com/the-best-of-rational-male-year-one/

Older concepts I'm aware of blend existential guides with religion or at least ethics - it's true that all of these can be seen as written for someone with a phallus.

>>6948506
Mental causes of actions can be spooky (like the concept of the title of greatest shitposter on 4chan).
A rice bag in China cannot.

I think I’ve encountered the claim before, that feminism is underlies, in some way the Marxist theory. I concluded that that’s just Americans talking, Americans which grew up being taught a an anti-Russian mentality.

Regarding what you then say: Why would anyone believe the minorities could be a placeholder for the whole working class - how would they ever control enough?

>perceived dominant power
but they were the dominant power - maliciously intended or not.

>>6715681
>>6715756

Can someone list examples of contradictions?

I've only read Wittgenstein in full, not more prose-type philosophers.

>>6482433
From reading the bio on the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on him, he didn't seem to live the happiest of lives, so I won't try to admire his actual mindset - rather I just take from the book what makes sense to me.

Someone on /fit/ asked me why Nietzsche is so famous in comparison - I'm really a scientist, I have no idea. My guess was that either Nietzsche was a better writer or he lived at better times. Knew Wagner and so on. What is it?