/lit/ - Literature

Where should i start with his works?

What could someone have to gain by attempting an assassination of Dugin? Was his ideas this dangerous - is the pen truly mightier than the sword?

>>20127098
Eurasia is. It's actually the only thing that is real because it's the closest thing to the ideal platonic state.

>All changed when the Water Nation attacked

Who can I read that is similar to Dugin?

He literally predicted everything
What the fuck

Does anyone here read Dugin?

Can I get a TLDR on his overall position? Can't find much material online and i don't want to buy his books without knowing much about his positions and what he argues.

what's his endgame?

Are any of his books worth reading or is it all just schizo ramblings and/or psy ops?

>Better to read not 1000 books, but one book 1000 times.
thoughts?

Rate it:

Plato all

Aristotle all

Proclus

Thomas Aquinas

John Damascene

Schelling (especially later works such as Philosophy of Mythology and Philosophy of Revelation)

Hegel's main works

Nietzsche

Freud

Jung (all)

Husserl (crisis of European sciences - all later)

Heidegger

Guenon

Evola

Deleuze / Guattari

Nick Land

Reza Negarestani

There is a growing effort to use the word "Traditional" as applied to Sunnism to mean "non-political". This can be traced back to the report by the RAND Corporation, "The Muslim World After 9/11, which suggests the CIA support non political Islam and refer to it as "traditional" (see the manifestion now today with men like Hamza Yusuf and Abdul Hakim Murad condemning political Sunnism as "modernist"--for example Murad says the death penalty for apostasy is "modernist" and cites an Ottoman ruling against it although this ruling came as part of 19th Century modernization which also legalized sodomy in the Ottoman Empire). This strategy was also adapted by Russia as we can with pic related who says he supports "Traditional" Sunnism against so-called "Wahhabism", and if you look at his description he defines each precisely by political dimension, one is "non political" and the other is political. Now, political Shia activity is not objectionable to Putin because it answers to a state which is safely brought under Russian orbit, I mean Iran. Political Sunnism used to answer to the House of Saud which was under American orbit, however with the onset of the Gulf War this drastically changed as the House of Saud brought American soldiers into Muslim holy land which was seen as both profane and politically treacherous by men like Ibn Laden. Consequently political Sunnism became increasingly de-achored from state supporters, and this reality really hit home when Saud initially funded political Sunnism against Assad only to deeply regret it and plead for Russia to intervene in Syria (which Russia otherwise would not have done just like Saud pleading is what brought America into the Middle East).

Now my point here is mainly Dugin because as we know he does *not* want to disposeof the five nation hegemony, I mean the permanent members of the UN security council. And political Sunnism has now become their collective enemy. Dugin likes to sound apocalyptic but ultimately he is just very very conservative and wants the keep the system notre sustainable by establishing spheres for the permanent security council, either direct or via their orbiters

>>17686008
Dugin

is there any good fascist lit, either fiction or nonfiction? Is Dugin a good place to start?

>>17400314
>>Guenon
>>more important than Heidegger
Yes, unquestionably.

Rene Guenon is the most correct, smartest and most important person of the twentieth century. There was no smarter, deeper, clearer, absolute Guenon and probably could not be. It is no coincidence that the French traditionalist René Allé in one collection dedicated to R. Guenon compared Guenon with Marx. It would seem that there are completely different, opposite figures. Guenon is a conservative hyper-traditionalist. Marx is a revolutionary innovator, a radical overthrower of traditions. But Rene Halle rightly guessed the revolutionary message of each of Guenon's statements, the extreme, cruel noncomformity of his position, which turns everything and everything upside down, the radical nature of his thought. The fact is that René Guenon is the only author, the only thinker of the twentieth century, and maybe many, many centuries before that, who not only identified and confronted with each other secondary language paradigms, but also put into question the very essence of language (and metalanguage).

The language of Marxism was methodologically very interesting (especially at a certain historical stage), subtly reducing the historical existence of mankind to a clear and convincing formula for confronting labor and capital (which, in fact, was a colossal revolutionary and predictive course, because it allowed many things to be systematized and brought together into a single, more or less consistent, dynamic structure). Being a great paradigmatic success, Marxism was so popular and won the minds of the best intellectuals of the twentieth century. But R. Guenon is an even more fundamental generalization, an even more radical removal of masks, an even broader worldview contestation, putting everything into question.

- Aleksandr Dugin

Post recommendations, greatest hits, oldies but goodies

>Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin

This guy has very close connections with the Russian government. Does anyone here know much about Dugin? I don't trust wikipedia.