[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.20815755 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, chalmers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20815755

>>20813514
Why does he make physicalists and eliminativists seethe so much? Is it because they realize they’re losing the final battle between dogmatic faith and reason?

>> No.20698705 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20698705

>>20698101

>> No.19735696 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19735696

>In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony information processing. But because, I am enlightened by my own qualia.

>> No.19392998 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19392998

With the recently released 2020 Philpapers survey, we now have an updated and more-than-ever detailed view of what philosophers believe. It seems that some philosophical questions are solved, considered closed questions beyond any doubt. Here is the consensus:
A priori knowledge: yes
Experience machine (would you enter?): no
External world: non-skeptical realism
God: atheism
Moral judgement: cognitivism
Philosophical methods: conceptual analysis
Science: scientific realism
Abortion: permissible
Capital punishment: impermissible
Chinese room: doesn't understand
Other minds (for which groups are some members conscious?): adult humans, cats, newborn babies
Rational disagreement (can two people with the same evidence rationally disagree?): permissivism
True contradictions: impossible

>> No.17991455 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17991455

yobbo-core

>> No.17963464 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, David Chalmers TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17963464

>>17961971

>> No.16613040 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, david.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16613040

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyS4VFh3xOU
Thoughts on Dr. David, the foremost philosopher of our day?

>> No.15564984 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, Chaders.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15564984

>shut the fuck up, p-zombie

>> No.15119840 [View]
File: 465 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15119840

>>15116432
t. philosophical illiterate

>> No.10357207 [View]
File: 474 KB, 972x1647, david chalmers2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10357207

>>10357187
>he says no redpills
>he redpills everyone in the audience
what did he mean by this

>> No.10343617 [View]
File: 474 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343617

is his work mad neo-carnapism? should i read the conscious mind?

>> No.10343614 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 474 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343614

has anyone here read David chalmers?

is his work mad neo-carnapism?

should i read the conscious mind?

>> No.6665786 [View]
File: 474 KB, 972x1647, David_Chalmers_TASC2008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6665786

>>6665781
Classy indeed

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]