/lit/ - Literature

>>12886649

>>10140017

>Implying a creative nothing would create other languages it does not and will never understand, that actually translate into real information.

>Implying a creative nothing creates something if it does not act upon it. There is something that exists that you will see, know of, or interact with. It still objectively exists.

>Implying there are any other actual people being or experiencing being, any relation between these beings would constitute a "most tangible" world, and without the ability to enact agency outside that system, such a system must be treated as reality.

And best of alllllllllll
>Implying you are the creative nothing, Existential thought and the understanding of oneself, who you are meant to be, is infinitely more important than understanding the mechanics of the world you've already accidentally generated.

I'm thinking that this must be a troll, or a different person. Honestly, if you're a troll, I'll admit I've been had. I've basically devoted my life to neurocognition research to study how far down our understanding of being is, and how universal it is, to fuck over Stirnerfags.

>>10140057

>Bocco No Pico

But more seriously, Elfen Lied, The Big O, Cellphone Diaries, Cowboy Bebop.

>>9896444

This. The article selection focused on the perspective and cognition, not politics. Honestly, it's telling that she recommended it to you.

She wants you to learn more about, not even how women view the world, merely that women view the world. The reference frame is secondary to you understanding them as an individual human entity outside yourself, which may not be a skill you maintain.

You exploding in response to the idea that women see out of eyes and thinks things in relation to being is disproportionate, inappropriate, and moderately funny.

>>8765175
Bullied girl with panic attacks goes to village in middle of nowhere for treatment. She starts seeing the ghost of a guy who was killed in there that asks her to find out what happened to his lost little sister. Horror, drama, mistery and a thousand plot twists ensue.

Something like that.

In 1984 Winston and O'Brien talks about solipsism. I'Brien then talks about collective and individual solipsism without going further into it. What is the difference between the two /lit/? Any chance someone could give me a crash course in solipsism?

You are something the whole universe is doing in the same way that a wave is something the whole ocean is doing.