[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.9024847 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 45 KB, 640x414, genderbread.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9024847

What does /lit/ think about social constructionism?

As you all know, race, gender and orientation are 100% socially constructed. But let me make the claim, that even biological sex is nothing but a social construct.

Some say it’s based on chromosomes (of which there are many non-XX/XY combinations, as well as diversity among people with XY chromosomes), others say it’s genitals or gonads (either at birth or at the moment you’re talking about), others say it’s hormone levels (which vary widely and can be manipulated), still others say it’s secondary sex characteristics like the appearance of breasts, body hair and muscle mass (which vary even more). Some say that it’s a combination of all of them. Now, this creates a huge problem, as sex organs, secondary sex characteristics and hormone levels aren’t anywhere close to being universal to all men or women, males or females. Whatever I am born like, the language used to describe me is up to society.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]