/lit/ - Literature

>>18070371


HE IS A SWINDLING CHINESE AUTOMATON —WHAT DO YOU EXPECT? STOP SPAMMING THIS BOARD WITH VIRAL ADVERTISING THREADS; VIRAL MARKETING IS A BANNABLE OFFENSE.

>>17350410


WHY IS THE COVER TO THAT EDITION OF MARCVS AVRELIVS’ «MEDITATIONS» A PHOTOGRAPH OF A BUST OF LVCIVS VERVS?

>>17257414

1. THERE ARE SIX CONTINENTS:

— AMERICA.

— EUROPA.

— AFRICA.

— ASIA.

— OCEANIA.

— ANTARCTICA.


2. NORTHAMERICA, AND SOUTHAMERICA, ARE TWO OF THREE AMERICAN SUBCONTINENTS, THE OTHER ONE BEING CENTREAMERICA —QVOD VIDE THE MAP THAT I POSTED IN THIS THREAD.

>>17040901

>THESIS – ANTITHESIS – SYNTHESIS.

>... linguistic astrology game like kabbalah...


?

>>13247457

AMBAS LENGUAS —LA ESPAÑOLA, Y LA INGLESA, ME SON NATIVAS, YA QUE LAS APRENDÍ SIMULTÁNEAMENTE, PERO ESTO NO ES IMPORTANTE; LO IMPORTANTE ES QUE, TÉCNICAMENTE, EL DOBLE NEGATIVO, Y LA LOCUCIÓN: «MÁS QUE A NADA», SON INCORRECTAS, IRRESPECTIVAMENTE DE QUE SEAN VULGARMENTE COMUNES.

>>13241320

I LAMENT MANY THINGS —EXEMPLI GRATIA: THAT THE MAJORITY OF HUMANS ARE ZOOPHAGOUS, THAT THE MAJORITY OF HUMANS ARE IGNORANT OF GOD, THAT THE MAJORITY OF HUMANS ARE SUBHUMAN, ET CETERA—; THE FACT THAT THE MAJORITY OF HUMANS DO NOT READ BOOKS IS NOT ONE OF THESE THINGS.

>>13226166
>... the vast majority of books written in languages other than English simply aren't that good and aren't worth reading.

HOW WOULD YOU KNOW, IF THE ONLY LANGUAGE THAT YOU KNOW IS ENGLISH?

>>13181485
>... translation...

>>13176025

>>13146185
>... like... Carl Sagan's Cosmos...

>>13106084

NOONE WANTS TO READ A MEMOIR BY AN ANONYMOUS NONPERSON; ANONYMITY IS ANTITHETICAL TO THE PURPOSE OF A MEMOIR.

>>13099008

DO YOU EVEN THINK?

>>13035457

I PRESUME THAT BY «AMERICA» YOU ARE NOT REFERRING TO THE CONTINENT, BUT TO A COUNTRY IN THE CONTINENT; IF SO, WHAT YOU MEAN IS: «UNITEDSTATES», NOT: «AMERICA», OR, IF YOU WANT TO BE TECHNICALLY CORRECT, WHAT YOU MEAN IS: «FEDERATED STATES OF ANGLOAMERICA».

>>12991893

READ HEGEL.

DO YOU SEE? ONE CAN DO THAT ALSO AS A RESPONSE, BUT SUCH RESPONSE IS NONARGUMENTAL, AND, ULTIMATELY, FUTILE.

I MADE A THREE «POINTS», AND EXPLICATED HOW YOUR STATEMENT IS FLAWED; IF YOU CANNOT COUNTERARGUE, IT IS BETTER TO ABSTAIN FROM RESPONDING.

>>12945097
>... translation...

>>12925709
>translation

>>12865533
>>12865535
>>12865573

EL PERPETUO ANGLO MUESTRA UNA VEZ MÁS SU DEFICIENCIA ESTÉTICA.

>>7047939
>ancientaliensdebunked.com

...

REGARDLESS, THEIR "DEBUNKING" IS BASED ON THE FALLACIOUS PRESUMPTION THAT THOSE PICTURES WERE INTENDED AS DEPICTIONS OF "ALIEN/EXTRATERRESTRIAL BATTLES/EVENTS CAUSED BY ALIEN/EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEINGS", SO THE ENTIRE ANALYSIS IS SPURIOUS, BESIDE, HERMETIC/ALCHEMICAL IMAGES, ASTRONOMICAL RECORDS, AND DEPICTIONS OF "PARANORMAL" MANIFESTATIONS, ARE ALL BEING CONFLATED BY THE PERSON, OR PERSONS, WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE.

>1. [WHAT] [AUTHORS] would you recommend to an intelligent young chap you met at the pub, but who unfortunately is on the wrong track in life (according to you)?

HERAKLITUS, SAVITRI DEVI, JOSÉ VASCONCELOS.

>2. If a grill is reading a book at a café, subway, or similar, which title would make you most inclined to approaching her?

NONE.

1. I DO NOT APPROACH "STRANGERS" ON THE STREET WITH SOCIAL INTENTIONS JUST BECAUSE WE SEEM TO HAVE SHARED INTERESTS.

2. IF I LIKE SOMEONE, "STRANGER", OR OTHERWISE, I WOULD DO SO BASED ON OTHER FACTORS BESIDE JUST WHAT BOOK HE/SHE IS READING.

>3. Who is your favourite film director, and optionally which of his films do you like most?

IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER:

WESLEY ANDERSON, "THE ROYAL TENENBAUMS".

MICHAEL HANEKE, "DER SIEBENTE KONTINENT".

LUCILE HADZIHALILOVIC, "INNOCENCE".

>4. Who is your favourite artist or composer?

ARTIST, OR COMPOSER? CHOOSE ONE; THE TERMS ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS.

>5. What is your occupation and income bracket (income bracket N/A in the case of students)?

N/A.

>6. Which social class did you grow up in (income totally irrelevant)?

SOCIAL CLASSES ARE SPURIOUS CONCEPTS.

>7. Do you read books again?

RARELY, AND WHEN I DO IS PARTIALLY OR SOME SPECIFIC PART.

>8. Have you read The Bible?

YES.

>9. Have you read Capital?

NO.

>10. Have you read Infinite Meme?

YES, BUT NEVER FINISHED READING IT.

>11. Did you start with the Greeks?

NO.

>12. Why not?

I DID NOT CONSCIOUSLY BEGIN TO READ, NOR DID I BEGIN TO READ METHODICALLY, OR WITH SOME PROGRESSIVELY LINEAR SCHEME.