/lit/ - Literature

>>17987589
Top fucking kek. If you believe this you are millitary-grade retarded.

>>9941069
> Implying that you will be spared from the firing squad once the tanks roll through your town square.

We're all in this together you know.

>wanted order without power

>>9407763
glad to see /lit/ still has a sense of humor

>>6045358
>he is an official wizard

>>5959505
> renting books from the library
> not keeping them forever

fokin plub

>>5563343
>Ooops I blundered so what

>>4953712
>The audio narration move so fast that I could not keep up.

>>4787765
Lel

>>4787756
Cojonudos = españoles
Vergeros = venezolanos
Boludos = argentinos
Pinche culeros = mexicanos
Mamaguevos = cubanos, puertoriqueños, dominicanos
Puta la wea fome = chilensis
Colombianos?

>>4666120

>>4315069
>pirates pretend to care about copyright owners

>>3886556
>>3886551
>>3886554

Good enough

>>3881998
That's right, I stay and demand breakfast before leaving.

>>3681373
>Unlike other scientists Dawkins isn't just an uneducated hipster who talks some soft dumbed down drivel consisting of insufficient analogies. But at least their intentions are benevolent and they might even appear helpful to those who will never go deeper into scientific understanding.
10/10

>mfw it's literally high school english class in here talking about nabokov as pedo cuz lolita

you guys realize the narrator in lolita says he hates and thus fucks with psychoanalysts in the very beginning of the book, right?

nabokov hated psychoanalysis too. he was paranoid they would psychoanalyze his butterfly hunting interests as his sublimation of his pedophilia. so to beat them to it, he wrote a book about pedophilia that, when psychoanalyzed is actually about sublimated butterfly hunting.


pynchon however, though he did take classes from nabokov, probably didn't realize this. pynchon writing was more influenced by burroughs probably. his pedophilia has to do with vying against his puritan background: making everything holy profane.

>>3602424
10/10

>>3527778
>It's mostly about explaining why epistemology must be naturalized to understand how we think in a compatible way with the Theory of Evolution.

10/10

>>3518170

>>3431129

>>3413435
>Ethics is a science

One, deluded woman, this Ayn.

>>3398844
>Plato, Plotinus, Descartes, Leibniz, Berkeley, Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, McTaggart, Bradley and a bunch of others
>new-age hippies

at least you finally came out of the closet, not as a troll, but something far worse than that, an ignorant, cancerous faggot that i thought you were from the very beginning.

>>3331611
>Analytic philosophy>all

This is gold. Thanks for the glorious laugh.

Speaking of OP; for the love of god, don't be a fucking bigger idiot than you already are. Most certainly and obligatory, introduce yourself the history of philosophy (a must of all of Plato and Aristotle - I think I speak on behalf of Heidegger here) before attempting to read the Continental canon

Meanwhile, fuck off.

>>3303816
>1. god delusion, richard dawkins
>2. harry potter
>3. the hobbit

>>3244759
>neuroscience of evil