/lit/ - Literature

>>17120208
No

I think it's very much more worth it to keep occult shit in childrens stories(worth investigating) and un-interesting books.
The site seems to be too moral faggy for me,and sites are generally inflexible like that,an example of a site like this failing is JOS.
JOS was either a amazing normie filter or completely batshit retarded,maybe also a psyop.

Take goetic practices for example,''summoning'' and ''making deals'' with ''demons''.

The demons themselves aren't actually the monsters they are described to be(it still matters how they look),rather they are archetypes from the collective conscious,and they don't make you invisible or whatever stupid shit the goetia sometimes says,and Crowley pretends to be true.
The goetic demons are by far the weirdest thing,as they are barely known but somehow powerfull,it's like the writer of the key of solomon perfectly identified these archetypes,understood all the symbolism,and gave it to us.
It's like he became one with the collective conscious of humanity for long enough to write it,a true anonymous autist.

They testament of solomon is either a late translation or completely made up,Solomon himself might be a symbol,making the entire matter of wether it's a forgery or not pointless.

Occult esoteric shit should also be kept with as many filters,like retards(Crowley,hides a lot of truth in his works) and crackhead youtubers,these guys filter the normies and hylics really nicely.
Wiccans are also good since they are idiots and moral fags who care about muhh spirits,they look like idiots and don't reproduce,perfect cover up.