/lit/ - Literature

>>4305523
Via genetic engineering and eugenics means that conscious change is the fundamental basis of human nature. The means of change, whether they be scientific or otherwise, do not alter the condition of human nature(which in this case is change itself) but is in fact the logical extension of the human nature.

More or less, "sure, via genetic engineering or eugenics" is a circular argument for human nature as are most arguments for human nature.

>>3970979
I'm a little edgy from browsing /pol/ this morning, so I don't know.
If we want to reject the past for more than superficial reasons—not that transformation requires a rejection of the past; the post-modernists show this easily enough—we'll have to go deeper. There's no way around it.
"Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves"

For sale: babby's first constrained writing

Now, if an anon could pull off a Gadsby, I'd say "totally rad." It usually looks awkward if you do it for too long but I allow no allocation of fucks.

But if you target me, specifically, you've accepted a moral schema as a course of action. You'll have sold out on a philosophy that wasn't even yours and I'll be a martyr for my my own.

u lose fagit

Start off by writing "lower", "middle", and "upper" on the board. Have the students put a tally under their economic background. Then, have each student introduce themselves at the front of the classroom, along with their stances on abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia. Before they cant sit down, they also have to declare their least favorite race and major, and name one thing they're self-conscious about. This will enable freethought and make for overall more better class discussions. You'll thank me later, OP.

Is Slavery a stoic philosophy?

>>2389704
"First as tragedy, second as farce."

>>2310898
I cant really think of any arguments to refute your points as they all seem pretty fair.

Good show, friend.

is she a high elf?