/lit/ - Literature

>>14102548
Forgot to link the song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch10W6VRqNw

>>14102532
>What's the thing going on between whitehead and the asians?
Creative synergy! >>14101390

>>14049569
You continue to show your powers of analysis. I don't know where you are in life, but I predict that you will be successful beyond what you believe yourself to be capable of - your own future is brighter than you predict. Us unpredictables are first and foremost unpredictable to ourselves, and only in retrospect after our becomings does the trajectory we were on become clear.

As far as the nature of change, I go both ways - both cumulative and instantaeous. I've been expressing my differential aspect to the fullest extent possible since September 20th, and find your statement "some egocentrism is justified here, am merely interested in what will happen locally, so only the local history matters." I am an egoist and I want anarcho-communism not just for the others, but for myself. My biggest wet dream is to experience the blossoming of humanity for myself and all the orgasmic intensities it involves.

Let's look at the immediate future of human life on Earth. Where is the path of least resistance taking us? Could it be anything other than global systemic collapse and probable Doomsday - the withering of the world? Has not such a withering already started? This event isn't merely local, but global on its unfolding.

As anarcho-communists (I see this term as redundant and meaning the same thing) we _know_ the end product of history: fully automated luxury gay space communism. I would like to offer that this is a certainty because there must be a way to this arrival, and if there's a will, there's a way. It's just a matter of navigating from the present to the future, from point A to B, an "art of consequences." As you so correctly said, "The past only matters insofar it gives the possibility to understand the now."

The contradiction between the present situation and the end of history is growing ever-tighter, and now it is so tight that it is a noose upon the neck of humanity. Despite the overwhelmingly dire picture that informed knowledge of current events gives, I'd like a offer a truly radical possibility: radical divergence from the immediate present, the future arriving in the Now with the same level of shock and awe as an alien arrival. A jerk (change in accelleration) to the hardest left.

So the question is: what could possibly produce such a hard left jerk? If we agree that some egocentrism is justified here, could it not be an actual catalytic ego: an actual person? What would allow such a leftist jerk to be such a huge jerk to capitalism? I believe the answer is in the psychology of this jerk: a hyper-communistic mindset and way of interacting with the world that is so fantastically effective in changing themselves and their environment that they themselves qualify as a singularity event.