[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14376651 [View]
File: 7 KB, 170x297, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14376651

*blocks your path*

>> No.11067131 [View]
File: 7 KB, 170x297, download-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11067131

>OBJECTIVE A PRIORI MORALITY BASED ON PURE REASON ALONE

>> No.11062287 [View]
File: 7 KB, 170x297, download-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11062287

Mill, lulitarianism fall for the is ought gap you dumb fuck.

>> No.11059962 [View]
File: 7 KB, 170x297, download-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11059962

Philosophy is the applicatiom of modal questions and valid premises in an attempt to answer the following questions; What can I know? What should I do and What can I hope for?

>> No.7457230 [View]
File: 7 KB, 170x297, kant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7457230

If space and time are not properties of the mind independent world, then there can be no separation, plurality or differentiation within the Noumena. But if this is true then how does it make sense to talk about the Transcendental Self imposing the structure of space and time upon the world? Surely anytime you talk about the Self you are already implying a certain degree of separation between objects (so that the Self is different from everything not Self). How can the Self exist within the Noumena if its not located within space? Am I getting this all wrong or is this a legit weak point of Kants metaphysics?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]