/lit/ - Literature

>>20853248
I am sorry to hear that you've had a hard time in this life. You might consider that your presuppositions regarding the potential case for an afterlife might be unreliable, given that you would be analyzing the arguments for/against from a bit of a biased lens (as we all do). Being aware of this, consider that it might be best to attempt to account for your biases by conducting dispassionate research into the topic, not by what seems most favourable or likely based upon your intuitions and feelings, but by the logical arguments for/against the reality of such a thing.

In practice, this might mean that although you claim to not have an interest in knowing God (or whether or not His existence can be known), you should conduct serious and dispassionate research into this topic - if only because of the potential repercussions of coming to the wrong conclusion on such a topic. If there exists a God and it is possible to know Him, it is imperative that one attempts to discover whether or not He revealed critical information as regards soteriology to humanity. This would mean weighing the strongest arguments put forth by the most competent apologists for the soteriological systems in the world, which would be a fun and challenging journey.

To do otherwise would be, frankly, illogical, given the stakes. Though the topic might not interest you, entering into the journey will compel you once you begin. After all, the door is opened to all who knock.