/lit/ - Literature

>>8091218
>Do you think there are books that aren't worth reading after a certain age?

Yes but half of the ones you listed are trash and the rest are actually really good top-tier /lit/

great /lit/erature
>Don Quixote
>The Odyssey
>In Search of Lost Time
>Shakespeare
>Dostoevsky

not amazing but still high quality
>Hemingway
>Heart of Darkness
>Sound and the Fury
>Lolita
>One Hundred Years of Solitude

iffy
>Murakami
>Bukowski
>Of Mice and Men
>Catch-22

you have to be 18 to post on this board tier
>1984
>Great Gatsby
>Catcher in the Rye

/thread

>>7822122

>In art history class (just for the elective credits btw but its still sometimes interesting)
>teacher brings up example of a statue done of Hercules wrestling Antaeus
>teacher starts to explain it but then asks if anyone knows the myth, silence
>I speak up and explain the myth when nobody else does
>sophisticated.jpg
>teacher "thank you anon, very good"

>>7278060

gatekeeper indeed

>Noam Chomsky is in Denial About 9/11
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article35595.htm


>Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11
http://digwithin.net/2013/11/29/chomsky/