/lit/ - Literature

>>17932955
>In other words, he says that it's *normal* to want to rape women
>his undeniable views that women *should* be dominated by men
Journalistic sophistry at work

>>15310226
Ahem

>>14501853
Be careful anon, insulting English philosophy is a one-way ticket to being haunted by David Hume.

>>13586727
ftfy
Just looking at the portly bastard comforts you

>>13567274
>>There isn't an objective morality, but one should
dropped

>>13468676
*eats your attack on faith*
>I am the better pleased with the method of reasoning here delivered, as I think it may serve to confound those dangerous friends or disguised enemies to the Christian Religion, who have undertaken to defend it by the principles of human reason. Our most holy religion is founded on Faith, not on reason; and it is a sure method of exposing it to put it to such a trial as it is, by no means, fitted to endure.

>>13459594
I hate his stupid sanguine smile

>>13453759
no

>>13431523
>blocks your path

>>13423354
*chomps*

>>13401548
>There is nothing in philosophy you can ponder that sciences cannot explain
Ever heard of the problem of induction?

>>13032561
>I am the better pleased with the method of reasoning here delivered, as I think it may serve to confound those dangerous friends or disguised enemies to the Christian Religion, who have undertaken to defend it by the principles of human reason. Our most holy religion is founded on Faith, not on reason; and it is a sure method of exposing it to put it to such a trial as it is, by no means, fitted to endure.

>>12931087
>starting with the greeks is fascist
so?
>should
*ahem*

>>12899922
*ahem*

>>12879757
>proof

>>11674150
>Any definite state of the universe, at any given time, is the cause of the next moment.
>implying necessary connections

>>11248546
>that because there is no objective right or wrong we should tolerate all actions
>should
Who did you read that makes this proposition? Or is this your intuitive siphoning of the normie nousphere...

>studying scholastic philosophy
>it's all just ashes

/lit/, who was the greatest philosopher to ever live?

>>11085975
>lmao I don't know!

IF I TOUCHED YOUR STOVE, WOULD I DIE?

>>10606467
The avatars are only personifications of our ideas (of them) so I wonder what has Dunbar's nr to do with this.
Either way, nicely said! I felt kinda the same way since I came on /lit/ and saw how many threads got dedicated to certain persons and the reductionism surrounding those figures. I think this is also the reason most of the people with a broad range of ideas are not as shitposted on /lit/ as, say, Hume or Descartes, or even hacks like Peterson
>lmao dude I don't know!

>>10173976

yes, yes, very good reny, however..