/lit/ - Literature

>>16336764
But are not, these shackles a birth right?
We all have them, subconscious egoistic desires.
One can justify their Humility as lack of egoistic nature, but it always comes down to conscious decision to justify it.

If we would have no ego, we would give our foot to a crocodile, but it is always about what we gain from our conscious actions that stems from subconscious desire to have, control, have and be the center of ones perspective.

Love etc. is no different even if it appears to be all giving, it has an egoistical foundation.

If one can recognize human fragility, only then, he can improve, influence the subconscious as you are now aware of its existence (Jung thought).
We all are shackled in nature - to be just a human and we will never be distinct from our nature, thus we can improve only within its bounds but in the end only as a conscious egoist.

>>16336764
But are not, these shackles a birth right?
We all have them, subconscious egoistic desires.
One can justify their Humility as lack of egoistic nature, but it always comes down to conscious decision to justify it.

If we would have no ego, we would give our foot to a crocodile, but it is always about what we gain from our conscious actions that stems from subconscious desire to have, control, have and be the center of ones perspective.

Love etc. is no different even if it appears to be all giving, it has an egoistical foundation.

If one can recognize human fragility, only then, he can improve, influence the subconscious as you are now aware of its existence (Jung thought).
We all are shackled in nature - to be just a human and we will be distinct from our nature, thus we can improve only within its bounds but in the end only as a conscious egoist.