/lit/ - Literature

By now I am absolutely convinced that I will bring forth into the world of contemporary literature/art ideas that are so far removed from anything that is being discussed as of now that I will single-handedly shift the entire paradigm of today's conceptual landscape, yes my discourse is that next level, no I will not elaborate.

Christianity fuckin sucks and is boring.

>>14183963
Christ! Read Engels before jumping to conclusions about concepts you don't understand, please! As aforementioned, read "The Origin of the Family Private Property and the State"! The state which you are in sickens and disgusts, perhaps you are a result of the higher classes reinforcing your beliefs in traditionalism -- a traditionalism which has oppressed the lower classes for centuries. Why do you cling to ideas uncritically? You see something that goes against your worldview; a worldview which has most obviously been instituted to oppress, and it enrages you! Open your mind, not your heart which yearns to oppress, READ ENGELS!
>>14183972
The goal of Communism is to crush the state, pudding-head.

>>14142250
Why would I do that? Self denial that doesn't benefit me is pointless.
>>14142253
You don't know what nihilism is. Read Nietzsche before you criticize. Your whole post reeks of misunderstanding. Please explain how Christianity "solves" nihilism.
>>14142259
He clearly has not. I believe Schopenhaurer has refuted causa prima, for one. And what have our own worthy, honest German professors of philosophy been doing in behalf of their dearly beloved Cosmological Proof, since Kant dealt it the death blow in his Critique of Pure Reason? — they, who prize truth above everything. They were, indeed, at their wits ends, for — as these worthies well know, though they do not say so — causa prima is, just as well as causa sui, a contradictio in adjecto, albeit the former expression is more generally used than the latter. It is besides usually pronounced with a very serious, not to say solemn, air; nay, many people, especially English Reverends, turn up their eyes in a truly edifying way when they impressively and emphatically mention that contradictio in adjecto: the first cause. They know that a first cause is just as inconceivable as the point at which Space ends or the moment when Time first began. For every cause is a change, which necessarily obliges us to ask for the preceding change that brought it about, and so on in infinitum, in infinitum! Even a first state of Matter, from which, as it has ceased to be, all following states could have proceeded, is inconceivable. For if this state had in itself been the cause of the following ones, they must likewise have existed from all eternity, and the actual state existing at the present moment could not have only just now come into being. If, on the other hand, that first state only began to be causal at some given period, something or other must have changed it, for its inactivity to have ceased; but then something must have occurred, some change must have taken place; and this again obliges us to ask for its cause i.e. a change which preceded it; and here we are once more on the causal ladder, up which we are whipped step by step, higher and higher, in infinitum, in infinitum! (These gentlemen will surely not have the face to talk to me of Matter itself arising out of nothing! If so, they will find corollaries at their service further on.) The causal law therefore is not so

>>14096950
Musical education should consist of ear-teaning, learning intervals and chords and polyrhythms, instead of just playing garbage tier monophonic instruments like the Sousaphone with the bare minimum of competency.

>>14096479
I doubt YOU’ve read the KJV if you think its so intractable that you need a companion to comprehend it.