/lit/ - Literature

>>13383967

He is the only writer in history that wrote an actual incel character, but this was before "incel" was used as a commonplace word. Probably before chans even existed in the west.

Look up Raphael Tisserand. He's a 30 or 40 year old virgin (I don't remember anymore) that fails in every way in his love and sex life, culminating on a scene where he tries to talk to a woman and gets rejected, and she immediately turns around and dances with a black guy and goes to a beach to fuck with him in public. The main character of the book (not an incel, just a doomer) eggs Tisserand on to act on his incel urges and kill both the woman and the black guy, but upon arriving at the beach Tisserand masturbates to them fucking and then dies on the next scene. I can't remember if he kills himself or if he has a car accident, but he dies. Tell me that's not an incel character

>>5845965

That's not his point, though. It's not that economic liberalism directly causes sexual liberalism, it is that they are analogous. The removal of traditional and cultural institutions such as marriage perform similar roles to a kind of sexual social-democracy- they limit the anarchy of a pure free-for-all in the market of desire and pretty much guarantee that the vast majority of people will have a minimum of sexual relations.

Just as when we see all economic controls removed human nature is laid bare and some people amass massive fortunes whilst others are left in the gutter, some people in modern society will have an interesting sexual life and others will have none