/lit/ - Literature

>>18046217
It sucked. So much hard work and it would be boring as shit. And the risk of death from disease, famine, farming accidents etc. was insanely high, not to mention most of your children wouldn't make it to adulthood. What a horrible life. Instead I can live in a nice comfy house and go to McDonalds and watch anime.

>>17448305
It’s okay.
Thanks for asking

>>16791483
>We will have war.
No. Women with absurdly high standards who aren't able to find men weak enough to tolerate them will live lonely, pathetic lives after their beauty fades after (sometimes before) their early thirties. Men will buy prostitutes. The breakdown to conventional romantic relationships hurts women exponentially more than it hurts men. In fact, the tangential social changes (libertine sexuality) are probably a good trade-off for men. We're already seeing this come true.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anECwFYnyh0

How to write romance stories that will sell on Amazon?

Where do I start with Spinoza?

>>16493640
"Ellul’s issue was not with technological machines but with a society necessarily caught up in efficient methodological techniques. Technology, then, is but an expression and by-product of the underlying reliance on technique, on the proceduralization whereby everything is organized and managed to function most efficiently, and directed toward the most expedient end of the highest productivity. Ellul’s own comprehensive definition is found in the preface of The Technological Society: 'Technique is the totality of methods, rationally arrived at and having absolute efficiency (for a given stage of development) in every field of human activity.'"

>>16293927
I left college in 2008. It was that bad then

How many pages do you read per day?
I try to read at least 10 pages per day.
And you?