[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18419448 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1600x550, oxford.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18419448

>>18419387
>he goes to a 'university' founded barely over a century ago
lmao

>> No.16979846 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1600x550, 16CB389F-2977-4481-B17F-5D2E98616C83.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16979846

Flopped my Oxbridge interview today so give me some book recommendations that will help me over this empty feeling inside
Something to do with over coming mistakes and having your failures strengthen you perhaps

>> No.16913933 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1600x550, ED372B80-BD8F-487D-83E7-0A80A37CCB42.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16913933

I have my Oxbridge HAT (History aptitude test) tomorrow morning and I’m here for last min advice
What I know is that the question will be based on two sources from history, so in essence it’s a comparative essay. I have an hour to write about this. Now as it’s based on your analytical ability it’s hard to give advice for, however I’m just curious how other anons would go about structuring this?
My plan is to write an intro then two themed paragraphs conspiring the sources, a paragraph on the origin and nature of the source and then a conclusion
I also have 2 interviews later this month, I know somewhere in here are Oxbridge students past and present so help me out bois

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]