/lit/ - Literature

I want to read the literature of Apu Apustaja's home country. What is some good Finnish literature?

Redpill me on digital humanities

Is philosophy a creative endeavor?

What are 10 essential philosophy texts I should read that will make me big brained

>>13547725
>>13548824
>>13548827
The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets - Frederic Mishkin (1986)
Money, Banking and Financial Markets - Laurence Ball (2008)

Basic Econometrics - Damodar N. Gujarati (1978)

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach - Jeffrey Wooldridge (2000)

Introduction to Econometrics - James H. Stock and Mark Watson (2002)

Econometric Analysis - William H. Greene (1990)

A Course in Econometrics - Arthur Goldberger (1991)
Econometric Theory and Methods - Russell Davidson James MacKinnon (2004)

Options, Futures and Other Derivatives - John C. Hull (1989)

Mathematics for Finance: An Introduction to Financial Engineering - Marek Capiński and T.J. Zastawniak (2002)

Stochastic Calculus for Finance I: The Binomial Asset Pricing Model - Steven E. Shreve (2004)

Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models - Steven E. Shreve (2004)

Game Theory - Eilon Solan, Michael Maschler, and Shmuel Zamir (2003)

Microeconomic Theory - Andreu Mas-Colell (1995)

(Teoria) Recursive Macroeconomic(a) Theory - Thomas J. Sargent (1979)

Econometrics - Fumio Hayashi (2000)

Estimation and Inference in Econometrics - Russell Davidson (1993)

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach and Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data - Jeffrey Wooldridge (2001)

When judging the quality of art, is everything subjective or is there objective measurement involved? How would I be able to objectively say stuff like
1.) Hamlet is better than something a 4 year old wrote
2.) Hamlet is better than Kafka on the Shore
3.) Hamlet is better than The Magic Mountain

Is philosophy completely retarded? Just read this, taken from Plato's Republic
>And do you think, my excellent friend, that a musician when he adjusts the lyre
would desire or claim to exceed or go beyond a musician in the tightening and
loosening the strings?
>I do not think that he would.
>But he would claim to exceed the non-musician?
>Of course.
>And what would you say of the physician? In prescribing meats and drinks
would he wish to go beyond another physician or beyond the practice of medicine?
>He would not.
>But he would wish to go beyond the non-physician?
>Yes.
>And about knowledge and ignorance in general; see whether you think that
any man who has knowledge ever would wish to have the choice of saying or
doing more than another man who has knowledge. Would he not rather say or
do the same as his like in the same case?
>That, I suppose, can hardly be denied.
>And what of the ignorant? would he not desire to have more than either the
knowing or the ignorant?
>I dare say.
>And the knowing is wise?
>Yes.
>And the wise is good?
>True.
>Then the wise and good will not desire to gain more than his like, but more than
his unlike and opposite?
>I suppose so.
>Whereas the bad and ignorant will desire to gain more than both?
>Yes.
>But did we not say, Thrasymachus, that the unjust goes beyond both his like
and unlike? Were not these your words?
>They were.
>And you also said that the just will not go beyond his like but his unlike?
>Yes.
>Then the just is like the wise and good, and the unjust like the evil and ignorant?
>That is the inference.
>And each of them is such as his like is?
>That was admitted.
>Then the just has turned out to be wise and good and the unjust evil and ignorant.

>>13475743
Whats the opposite

mr detective, I found the murder weapon!