/lit/ - Literature

>>13516927
Thanks

>>13516922
Why stop at that though?
The nature of the singularity itself should give so much more shit than a simple declaration of a singulairty and what it will be generally. The solving of time, or at least the issues temporality poses. Solving space and intensity. The nihilism both pose. Why consider capital as a form linked to the noumena rather than a future sort of the will of the proletatiat using this capital from the heights of the noumena. The interesting solution singularity posits to post-humanism and to gaia. Is it better to see this singularity as always here and ever present, rather than something materializing itself through our understanding/experience of time?
Too often I hear people read some of the accelerationists, declare we are going to a singulairty, and then stop there. Land at least says this and then after that declares we should only strap-on for the ride. Most people say the first half and then neglect the second half because they are so proud of themselves for arriving at the first half.