/lit/ - Literature

>>8421729
There is no discipline nor rules of any kind in his "art". It is the cause having now hordes of talent-less people, like Pollock, they can make art too, aiming at merely the shock value of a piece, whether it is against art itself (like Pollock, who certainly could not create art under traditional standards) or at politics as most people right now.

I have tried many times to find out why Pollock is good, and not surprisingly, people cannot give anything but vague words that could be applied to anything.

I don't think all modern art is bad, but I still have to find someone that gives me good reason to appreciate Pollock random ramblings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNI07egoefc