[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13744237 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, 31073345_979841055514278_9003109438629242462_n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13744237

>>13744229
based wittyposter

>> No.12583167 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, duckrabbit_season.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12583167

late, duh

>> No.12458673 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, 1530846578057.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12458673

In Wittgenstein's Philosophische Untersuchungen:

What is the difference between believing you are following a rule and following a rule?

Is it not actually a rule you are following when you are believing to follow one? With the sign example it is not relevant how you follow the rule, because not one person only can follow it, but is it possible to only believe you are following the rule of the sign (or is it as I said, that believing you are following a rule means there is none to begin with, not just you are following it incorrectly).

>> No.11643765 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, duckrabbit_season.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11643765

He'd do the analytic philosophy thing and refuse to engage on the grounds that the language isn't precise or clear enough.

>> No.11620489 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, duckrabbit_season.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11620489

fuck formalism in the ass

>> No.11518919 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, duckrabbit_season.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11518919

>> No.11419141 [View]
File: 309 KB, 676x376, 31073345_979841055514278_9003109438629242462_n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11419141

>>11418764
Thanks mate.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]