/lit/ - Literature

>reads Nietzsche, Spinoza and Hume once
>destroys Hegel forever
krautcels on suicidewatch

Time is pure exteriority. Start with Bergson and then continue with the greatest metaphysician of our time: Gilles Delueze
anglos tongue my anus

>destroys hegel
>destroys freud
>destroys heidegger
>destroys phenomenology in general
how did he do it?

>>20937507
>Kant provides a metaphysical justification for science
For a Newtonian world, sure. If you want a metaphysics sufficient for the science of today you'll need to talk to the Arch Pedo himself.

Why did Derrida become so popular instead of Deleuze when Derrida is such a philosophical eunuch?
let me illustrate what I mean by this with the virgin vs chad meme:
>the virgin Derrida "we cant bring differance into presence", "something trascends being and languaje and we dont have access to it" and just cuckold neo negative ontotheology in general vs the chad Deleuze "just do metaphysics without guilt and create concepts because inmanece eschews trascendence and ontology and there is no such thing as a text that contains everything"
Derrida is a neurotic insecure philosophy that doesnt dare to take a stance while Deleuze goes for a constant affirmation of the relationships between things within experience, there is no privation, while for Derrida there is always something "lacking". Fuck that nigga Derrida. He is only popular because "deconstruction" sounds cool and edgy but he is actually a wimp. I can't understand how people consider him transgressive or revolutionary. Can someone explain the appeal?

wtf is this guy talking about?

Is Deleuze the most schizo philosopher to have ever walked on the face of this earth?

Would you shake his hand?

>>18830538
>to actually use them to carry yourself to something otherwise unavailable.
so a line of flight?

Basedeuze and Bevola was on the same page

How was he so fucking based? Is he the best semiotics philosopher of the 20th century? What do you think of his metaphysics?

Why should I read Deleuze, /lit/?

do i have to read him in order to get art hoe pussy? will i become schizophrenic?

What do you think of this man?

I've read all of Nietzsche and Spinoza. Will I learn anything new from him or should I spare my time?

>>16852430
Educate yourself to understand "Capitalism and Schizophrenia", that should take you a while.

>>16838758
Yes, establishing ways of existing or styles of life isn’t just an aesthetic matter, it’s what Foucault called ethics, as opposed to morality. The difference is that morality presents us with a set of constraining rules of a special sort, ones that judge actions and intentions by considering them in relation to transcendent values (this is good, that’s bad…); ethics is a set of optional rules that assess what we do, what we say, in relation to the ways of existing involved. We say this, do that: or say through mean-spiritedness, a life based on hatred, or bitterness toward life. Sometimes it takes just one gesture of word. It’s the style of life involved in everything that makes us this or that.

Yes, establishing ways of existing or styles of life isn’t just an aesthetic matter, it’s what Foucault called ethics, as opposed to morality. The difference is that morality presents us with a set of constraining rules of a special sort, ones that judge actions and intentions by considering them in relation to transcendent values (this is good, that’s bad…); ethics is a set of optional rules that assess what we do, what we say, in relation to the ways of existing involved. We say this, do that: or say through mean-spiritedness, a life based on hatred, or bitterness toward life. Sometimes it takes just one gesture of word. It’s the style of life involved in everything that makes us this or that.

Is Deleuze right?
"Yes, establishing ways of existing or styles of life isn’t just an aesthetic matter, it’s what Foucault called ethics, as opposed to morality. The difference is that morality presents us with a set of constraining rules of a special sort, ones that judge actions and intentions by considering them in relation to transcendent values (this is good, that’s bad…); ethics is a set of optional rules that assess what we do, what we say, in relation to the ways of existing involved. We say this, do that: or say through mean-spiritedness, a life based on hatred, or bitterness toward life. Sometimes it takes just one gesture of word. It’s the style of life involved in everything that makes us this or that […]."

What fuxking name is THIS? How do you even pronounce it?

>>16193800
>his worldview is based on mental illness
so?

What is the psychology behind why the average Western leftist feels Blacks *have* to be oppressed? What is it fulfilling psychologically?

Are they racist and ashamed by it, and so ascribe their feelings of racist against Blacks to society writ large? Or do they feel powerful when they believe that Blacks are oppressed?

Who is the most important philosopher today and why is it Gilles Deleuze?

>31 replies
>literally nothing of value

Hey, why don't one of you faggots explain what you find valuable in Dugin?