/lit/ - Literature

>>17963014

>>17943126
Imagine being so subhuman that you agree with anything said in that steaming pile of copium.

>>17759109
>>female authors

C L E A N I T U P J A N N Y

No advertising or begging. It's a sitewide rule chuds.

>pic related
>the OP of this thread who will soon be banned

>there's a fire burning
>this is bad
>well I shouldn't put the fire out
>you see even though the fire causes bad things, extinguishing it is not worth the effort because I enjoy the spectacle it causes
>I should just warn people about why fires in the future shouldn't be caused
R E F U T E D
Go in a corner and start dilating antinatalist scum

...Anonymous
02/14/21(Sun)11:02:27 No.17544232
Image
my-image.png
266 KB PNG
>>17543431 (OP) #
done

17116734(You are a loser)#

>>17106892
>published author
Oh, really who is his publisher then?

>>17086879
>>17086775 (You) #
>Faulkner legitimately wasn't good at writing stories

>>17051282
>discussion can't be renewed
>checkmate theist
Look at this photo I snapped of you as you watched your reply successfully post

>>16980838
>NOOOOO YOU HAVE TO PRETEND TO BE RETARDED OR ELSE YOUR A NEWFAG!!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT THIS EXACT SAME THREAD GETS POSTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY TWO WEEKS FOR THE PAST 5 YEARS
>GIVE ME (YOU)'S FOR MY LOW EFFORT SHITPOSTS
>I SWEAR I AM NOT REDDIT!!! YOU'RE REDDIT FOR NOT PLAYING ALONG WITH THIS AWFUL JOKE
>DON'T YOU GET IT IS SO BAD AND LOW EFFORT IT IS FUNNY!!! YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND!!' IT IS LIKE THE ROOM DIRECTED BY TOMMY WISEAU!!'

pic related is you and everyone condoning the actions of this thread. just go back to /b/ you losers

S A G E
A
G
E

>Dickinson

>In order to make the book as direct and user-friendly as possible, I have avoided footnotes, references, and other tools scholars usually employ in their technical writing.

You have to guess from which of hundreds of papers a reference comes from. Why do they do this? Do people really think that reading footnotes is difficult?

Defend using an audiobook. Go on. I dare you. It is a position which cannot be defended. An audiobook gives no benefits. In ALL cases a physical book is better (Yes, this includes braille for the blind).

Defend using an ereader. Go on. I dare you. It is a position which cannot be defended. An ereader gives no benefits. In ALL cases a physical book is better.

>>16786797
>misspelled names
>Allan Poe
>Allan misspelled
>Poe misspelled
I rest my case, fedora-lord.

>>16657143
Prove it.

>>16637857
>>>16636884 (You) #
>>A bunch of losers who can't let go of dead memes. They live in the past and believe their lives were better when that meme was fresh. So they keep on posting it to delude themselves that they are hip, funny, and a cool 4channer.