/lit/ - Literature

>>17544941
>The two directly relate to each other and show the same thing in this particular topic.
As biology they relate to each other, as experience they do not. Do you feel the motion of atoms in your neurons as they fire off? No, you feel sensations of consciousness. That’s like saying that the thuroarytenoids play a role in giving a speech; it willfully misses the point.
> No it doesn't, it has different parts all in one moment, vision, hearing, emotion, touch, ideas, etc. These all register as different things intuitively despite being part of one conscious moment.
Demonstrably false, what you’re describing is clinical schizophrenia. We regularly have the various sensations given over to us recede and come to the front. No one is experiencing smell at all moments, but it comes to the forefront when it does. My skin is in contact with countless discrete surfaces I can feel, yet if I felt all of them in one moment I’d be completely overwhelmed. What my mind holds it’s intention on, by way of intentionality brings to the forefront the organs required for it. I’m driving I am not holding the idea of a red octagon in front of me, I am stopping. In looking at a clock I see no white circle cut up by regular black lines, I see that I am late or early
>>17544955
Come on now that’s not how dark is experienced.
>>17544944
>no one had practical conclusions prior to neurophysiology
>consciousness is a mystery
Is this your brain on materialism? Pure cope.

Why aren’t any of you posting images? This is an image board