[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20230098 [View]
File: 24 KB, 369x320, three-worlds-modified-roger-penrose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20230098

>>20229864
I watched it, I have no fucking idea why Jordan would even implicitly suggest that his archetypical psychology could be linked to bleeding edge astrophysics. What was he thinking. Playing devil's advocate you could say he was just there to learn, but come on. The whole thing was pretty awkward, but learning about pic related was fun, even if Penrose himself essentially said it's just a fun little art piece/thought experiment.

>> No.20224604 [View]
File: 24 KB, 369x320, three-worlds-modified-roger-penrose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20224604

>>20224337
As Peterson fan™ I wouldn't say he got BTFO since he was ostensibly there to learn and not debate, but it is so fucking glaringly obvious that Peterson's domain of archetypical/Jungian psychology is not at all compatible with cutting edge physics and I don't know what the fuck he was thinking to even implicitly suggest that there might be a connection. The whole thing was overall pretty awkward; it's weird that he would decide to upload this.

The only thing valuable I got out of watching this was learning about pic related, which even Penrose himself essentially says is just a fun little art piece/thought experiment.

>> No.17083514 [View]
File: 24 KB, 369x320, three-worlds-modified-roger-penrose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17083514

this shit?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]