/lit/ - Literature

>>22334612
>In the Latin word malus (to which I juxtapose -) the common man could be characterized as the dark-skinned and especially the dark-haired man (‘hic niger est –’), as the pre-Aryan occupant of Italian soil who could most easily be distinguished from the blond race which had become dominant, namely the Aryan conquering race, by its colour; at any rate, I have found exactly the same with Gaelic peoples, – fin (for example in Fin-gal), the word designating the aristocracy and finally the good, noble, pure, was originally a blond person in contrast to the dark-skinned, dark-haired native inhabitants.

On the Genealogy of Morality Essay 1 Section 5

>(The same holds good for virtually the whole of Europe: to all intents and purposes the subject race has ended up by regaining the upper hand in skin colour, shortness of forehead and perhaps even in intellectual and social instincts: who can give any guarantee that modern democracy, the even more modern anarchism, and indeed that predilection for the ‘commune’, the most primitive form of social structure which is common to all Europe’s socialists, are not in essence a huge throw-back – and that the conquering master race, that of the Aryans, is not physiologically being defeated as well? . . .)

On the Genealogy of Morality Essay 1 Section 5

>...the slaves’ revolt in morality begins with the Jews: a revolt which has two thousand years of history behind it and which has only been lost sight of because – it was victorious . . .

On the Genealogy of Morality Essay 1 Section 7

>Perhaps pain – I say this to comfort the squeamish – did not hurt as much then as it does now; at least, a doctor would be justified in assuming this, if he had treated a Negro (taken as a representative for primeval man) for serious internal inflammations which would drive the European with the stoutest constitution to distraction; – they do not do that to Negroes.

On the Genealogy of Morality Essay 2 Section 7

>From old Florentine novels—moreover, from life: Buona femmina e mala femmina vuol bastone.—Sacchetti, Nov. 86. (good women and bad women need beating)

Beyond Good and Evil Section 147

If Nietzsche were alive today he would be a chud and definitely not a communist. Most of the stuff that is assumed about Nietzsche is right. He was a racist anti-semite and a right-winger. The reason why this things are not considered true is because after the second world war he became a very controversial philosophers thanks to the Nazis and Hitler. So (((academics))) and (((Kaufmann))) tried to paint him as a misunderstood philosopher that were not a right-winger so that he could be read in the west. The best way to determine if a someone has not read a page of Nietzsche is if he says that Nietzsche would not have been a right-winger in modern times.