/lit/ - Literature

>>6826902

Saying Adam Smith is the "Freud" of economics is patently false; Freud was a fucking nutter. Freud was the Freud of psychology and it remains that way.

As far as Adam smith goes -- there's really no purpose in reading him unless you're into the historical and philosophical side of economics, and even then there's better options.

Start with some Thomas Sowell, OP. Very terse and easy to understand. He's a red-blooded capitalist, too.