/lit/ - Literature

>>12962709
ill break down for ya:
>>12962122
you post this which i respond with this
>>12962503
>sophist logic
you see what I mean here is the type of argumentation thats based on proper language but illlogical points e.x. theres 10 people i subtract 1 now theres 9 people 1 does not exist anymore nor does 10 but how can this be if something can't not exist therefore 9 does not exist. makes no sense right? sounds stupid? sounds like you
>>12962709
and here you do not bring up that part where you said you were trolling about it, so whats that post about? doubling back down on it again after you already came to terms that it was a conclusion on infallible mal logic. your going back on something that you yourself essentially refuted, keep up.