/lit/ - Literature

>>16631317
Environmentalism is cancer tho. The only reason to care about the issues you listed is the knee jerk reaction to maintain the ecological status quo, which is impossible. Conservation is not a moral position, and is predominantly what you'll get with "environmental literature", the soul purpose of which is to scare you with statistics that pretend life on Earth will just up and end. The Earth will solve its problems with or without us, the only reason to argue for the environmental approach is if you care about the humanity's presence on the Earth. If you answered yes, "environmentalism" won't cut it.
Anyways Wendell Berry is comfy in a nature-appreciation sense, and probably your best bet if you want a pseudo social ecology take from a more traditional perspective.