/lit/ - Literature

>>14892353
It's good because it reins in liberalism (which left unrestrained will destroy a people/civilization), and because it subordinates capitalism to higher values (ethnos being the most important imo).

Your question about violence seems loaded... All societies rely upon violence to maximize compliance with their ruleset — that's the human condition. If not for the threat of violence, I certainly wouldn't pay taxes to my 'democratic' gov. to help it continue foreign aid/misadventures in the middle east and 'the great replacement'.

Now I'm not utopian... Fascism wouldn't be perfect and there is always an element of corruption in any system. But we (white people in particular) need to push back hard against neoliberalism (endgame liberalism+capitalism) before it destroys us.

>>14123125
fpbp

>>12611283
>how to into a wise and uncorrupt elite?

I admit I'm not sure. The masses are too dumb for it to be grassroots imo. They will respond to serious declines in material needs, but will quickly resume their decline once things are 'good enough'. I think it would take a somewhat authoritarian and visionary political/intellectual movement to take over during crisis, and performatively demonstrate the desireability of their policies. I know that sounds all too familiar and dangerous, but realistically I don't see how else it could happen. I just don't believe in the capacity of average people to change course (or to know what the new course should be) until they're forced to.