/lit/ - Literature

>>20117036
Back in the day it obviously took the place of the photo so it was essential to society, a lot changed though ,i can go in depth but yes it is irrelevant except to the very rich. I wouldn't call it dead, contemporary art interweaves with public spaces, fashion, etc. Art always was in a way for the rich but it was found in every single church which was very important to the masses as well. It really has become SOLELY for the rich at this point and mostly as a status symbol. I don't really try to describe a style anymore, but i can show a picture of what i made recently. I've been doing oil pastels only the past 2 months, i got tired of paint. Btw i do follow a lot of art blogs/publications/galleries on insta that are contemporary minded, but its just odd desu how there's almost 0 public discussion about people who know about contemporary art.