/lit/ - Literature

EMPIRICISM CANNOT BE EMPIRICALLY JUSTIFIED. FOR EMPIRICISM TO WORK YOU HAVE TO ASSUME A METAPHYSICAL WORLDVIEW. IT IS A SELF-DEFEATING CONCEPT.
MATERIALISTS ARE PHILOSOPHICALLY ILLITERATE.

I dont know what to paint
It seems everything is possible but also meaningless.
But then again i know pol-tier shit is actually not possible

>library athiest moved all the religious books into the fiction section again

Hello /lit/
I am a STEMfaggot and I am taking a mandatory philosophy course at my college. I recently submitted an essay that I got an F on which basically killed my chances of keeping my huge scholarship. I wrote a big 1500 word essay (laugh all you want this is a 100-level course) that I was actually very proud of. I got full points for everything in my essay, grammar, flow, style, etc. but got absolutely none for analysis. The professor said I was just restating the text, even though I went out and tried to make connections to the outside world, climate change, racism, etc. all that bullshit that academic leftists love.

How do I write an essay? I don't know why this happened to me, because a prior essay in the class got me an A+ and I always excelled at essays in highschool, and this essay was no different from the essays I used to write. I even enjoyed writing all my life but this has basically killed my enjoyment for the liberal arts combined with all the lunacy that the professor teaches.

Does it get better or should I just avoid this and stick to science?

>>9144814
Come back once you've read the whole thing, faggot.