/lit/ - Literature

>>17530428
Good post, lots of good posts ITT actually. Nice to know you bros are out there. Check out Beautiful Losers if you're taking recs. Or Pound's Jefferson and/or Mussolini, but that's harder to read because he writes in arcane colloquialisms. Do you like Bowden?

"Theory" is okay if read right. I think it's just a tool. Can be used by anyone, and by itself it's meaningless and harmful, as the death of the left and its transformation into trannies and pedophilia justifying twitter retards shows. Critical theory is also often needlessly complicated for what it is, which plays into the hands of elites so I don't understand why the leftists do it. Probably because they're mostly rich assholes and other terminally urban people who despise the working class.

Anyone who says "theory" unironically is a moron who reads nothing though.

>>17530585
Even through all this time you can still tell he had something more than human to him.

Pic related is from Nagy-Talavera, Green Shirts which has some good stuff

jstor.org/stable/4214396